Friday Facility No.5 – Springfield Road, Horsham

In which an initially promising idea – a kerb-separated contraflow cycle lane – disintegrates into a confusing mess in the space of a few yards.

DSCN7869

The entrance. So far so good. We can turn left here, but motor vehicles can’t.

DSCN7870

We are also separated by a kerb from oncoming vehicles coming out of (the one-way) Springfield Road.

DSCN7871

Things start to go wrong. A kerb stops our progress, and we have to take an impossibly tight turn to cross to the other side, yielding to motor vehicles.

DSCN7872

Does the route end, or continue? There are some hieroglyphs on the opposite pavement, but what they signify is anyone’s guess.

DSCN7873

Mmm. Two cyclists attempting to use this facility in opposite directions would surely make for some Three Stooges-style hilarity.

DSCN7874

Is this is a shared use pavement? Is it not? Who knows. Probably best just to give up.

As this is a one-way road for cars, it is rather baffling why the carriageway is so wide here. There’s plenty of space for a proper solution (see below for a Dutch one-way street, with two-way flow for bikes) yet all we get is needless conflict with motor vehicles and pedestrians, and daubings of paint that are impossible to negotiate.

DSCN9318

This entry was posted in Friday facility, Horsham, Infrastructure, Town planning, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Friday Facility No.5 – Springfield Road, Horsham

  1. Jim Davis says:

    I could write at length about West Sussex County Council as you well know with their deeply car-centric policies and draconian attitiudes, but I think a pure and simple, ‘Oh for fucks sake!’ is sufficient in this instance.

    • It would be less offensive if they didn’t bother at all. What they build is so hopeless and half-arsed it makes it even more obvious they just don’t care.

      • Oh, West Sussex County Council do care. The problem is that they only care about maximising motor traffic, so they hate people who ride bicycles, especially the happy ones. This scheme probably deliberately encourages cyclists to ride on pavements, to maximise complaints about cyclists from pedestrians.

        This sort of thing would be hilarious (who on EARTH thought this was a sensible design!) if it wasn’t such a depressingly counter-productive waste of tax-payer’s money

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s